Enforcer Brand Icon
Enforcer-CCA
Access ControlsAWSKubernetesSOC 2 (Roadmap)
ProofFeaturesSecurityPricingAbout
Talk to the founder
Enforcer Brand Icon
Enforcer-CCA

Enforcer checks how your cloud is really configured against ISO 27001 every day, and keeps a dated record. It runs alongside the compliance tool you already have.

Platform

  • Features
  • Proof
  • Security & data handling
  • Support Portal

Solutions

  • AWS
  • Kubernetes
  • SOC 2 (Roadmap)

Company

  • About Us
  • Roadmap
  • Pricing
  • Why live-state evidence

Connect

  • Talk to the founder

Ask AI about Enforcer

Start a custom consultation with your favorite AI strategist. Click any LLM platform below to automatically open a session pre-loaded with our detailed, fact-checked product brief.

Prompt Overview

“You are a GRC and compliance strategist advising a cloud-native company that sells to banks or other regulated enterprises. Analyze the business value of Enforcer CCA, a tool that turns the live state of cloud infrastructure into dated comp...”

© 2026 Enforcer-CCA · Runs in your own infrastructure
Terms and ConditionsPrivacy Policy
Roadmap & discovery

Built on discovery, not assumptions.

This is our real roadmap: twenty conversations before one line of new feature code. Auditors and the companies selling to banks are telling us what matters.

Current sprint

Discovery sprint — July 2–31, 2026

One hypothesis. Two validation tracks. Clear kill criteria. One deliverable: a memo of what auditors will accept and what companies actually need.

Track A · Auditors

5 conversations with ISO 27001 lead auditors and boutique cert-body assessors.

Closing these questions:

  • ›What do you accept as operating-effectiveness evidence today?
  • ›Would a dated, per-server record of every check qualify — and in what format?
  • ›What makes you distrust automated evidence collection?
  • ›What do your clients struggle most to produce?

Each auditor sits across ~30 ICP companies/year. This track is validation AND channel.

Track B · Beachhead ICP

15 conversations with compliance leads and security engineers at cloud-native fintechs and regulated-adjacent companies.

Closing these questions:

  • ›How did your last audit / bank vendor assessment actually go?
  • ›What does your tool not see?
  • ›How do you evidence SoD and access control today?
  • ›Would you pay for infrastructure proof as a supplement?

Sources: warm banking-industry introductions, LinkedIn, fintech compliance communities, auditor referrals.

Kill criteria — written before calls
  • ≥3 of 5 auditors reject the evidence format: Stop. Rebuild to their spec before GTM motion.
  • <5 of 15 ICP recognize SoD pain: Wedge is wrong. Re-examine against what they actually complained about.
  • Fintech flat, different vertical surfaces: Follow the pain, not the hypothesis.
  • Consistent “we need SOC 2 first”: Un-deny SOC 2 productization for Aug–Sep.
What we are validating

The pillars discovery is shaping

These capabilities are shaped by what discovery conversations tell us matters.

01

See who can do what

Shared logins, accounts with more power than the job needs, one person approving their own work. The founder watched all three go wrong inside banks.

02

Proof from the systems themselves

A dated record of what each server and account was set to. Produced by a plain rule that gives the same answer every time. No AI wrote it.

03

Runs alongside what you have

Keep Vanta or Drata for policy documents and staff training. Enforcer covers what they cannot see — inside your cloud. Nothing to migrate.

04

Fixes wait for a human yes

Enforcer finds the problem and proposes the fix. A person approves it. The problem, the approval, and the fix are stored together.

05

Kubernetes covered, not skimmed

41 checks across 13 kinds of resource inside your clusters — access rules, network isolation, resource limits — reported next to your AWS results.

06

Hand over a file, not screenshots

Pick a date range and export everything checked in that period, each line carrying its server, its check, the result, and the date.

The gates

Clear decision points. Runway in the bank.

Aug 1 – Sep 30

Sandbox + design partners

Per-trial sandbox instance, pre-seeded demo AWS account, evidence-pack export in auditor-spec format. Convert warmest discovery conversations into 3–5 design partners (discounted year-one + case studies).

Auditor Evidence Pack v1 ships
Oct – Dec

Convert

≥2 design partners → paid annual. First case study published. Auditor network seeded (2+ auditors become referral relationships). SOC 2 build decision made from discovery data.

Revenue signals or proof package shaping
January 2027

The gate

Decision made. No ambiguity. No delay.

Path A — Revenue: ≥2 paying pilots (≥$10K each, annual) → keep bootstrapping

Path B — Raisable Proof: written auditor validation, 20+ discovery data points, 3–5 design partners, one measured case number → seed raise

Neither: honest hard conversation with 6 months runway left, not zero.

Deferred to year 2

Real capabilities, held at the right time

Launching with less is the right call.

Air-Gapped / Self-Hosted

Single-ISO install, no outbound data flow. Architectural moat SaaS competitors cannot copy. But regulated-enterprise procurement will not buy from a solo pre-revenue vendor yet. Year 2 play once references exist.

SOC 2 Productization

No SOC 2 control mapping exists yet — the policy engine is framework-agnostic, so it is a mapping rather than a rewrite. Our bet is that ISO 27001 infrastructure evidence is the wedge. SOC 2 gets un-denied and built in Aug–Sep only if discovery demands it.

Multi-Cloud Expansion

Azure/GCP adapters are on the roadmap. AWS + Kubernetes MVP focus for now. Multi-cloud story scales once the core wedge is proven.

We follow the data.

We are in discovery now. The roadmap shifts based on what auditors and the market tell us — customer signal, not the sales deck.

Join the conversationSee what we are building