Enforcer began inside banks, watching people quietly hold access they should never have had — while the compliance software signed everything off anyway.
Compliance software today is built around HR systems and questionnaires. It can tell you whether you wrote a policy. It cannot tell you whether your systems actually follow it. For a company that sells to banks — where who can touch what is the whole question — that difference can cost you the contract.
So Enforcer asks the systems directly, every day, and writes down the answer with a date on it. No automatic changes behind your back. No AI writing your compliance record. Just what was true, when it was true, and who approved anything that changed.
“I watched teams at major banks share access like candy. Nobody read the logs. And the compliance software certified all of it anyway. That is where Enforcer came from.”
They are not slogans — each one is the reason the product works the way it does, and each one costs us something.
A policy document says what you meant to do. Only the system itself can say what you actually did. We take the answer from the system.
Security that is true on audit day and unknown for the other 364 is not security. It is a photograph. We check every day.
Enforcer can fix what it finds, but only after a person says yes. Automation handles the busywork. It never handles the judgment.
Every finding comes from a plain, testable rule, so it gives the same answer twice and can be defended. We will not put a guess in a compliance file.
No auditor has reviewed our records yet, so we do not say one has. When something is on the roadmap, we call it the roadmap. In this business, credibility is the product.
Not firewalls. People quietly holding permissions they should never have had. We watched it happen inside banks. That is why this exists.
Founder
4+ years leading identity governance and access management at banks and financial institutions. Watched shared credentials and over-broad roles become the norm. That is the problem Enforcer solves: turning what auditors cannot see into proof they can trust.
The product is built and running. What we have not done yet is sit down with ISO 27001 auditors and have them tell us, on the record, whether our evidence is what they will accept — and ask the companies that sell to banks whether the gap we see is the one that actually hurts them. That is the work in front of us. January 2027 is our own deadline: paying customers, or the honest proof that this is worth someone else's money.
The founder answers every message himself. If the gap we describe is not the one that hurts you, that is exactly what we want to hear.
Talk to the founder